update parsing comment

This commit is contained in:
Simon Gardling 2022-04-23 20:42:27 -04:00
parent 7058cd7123
commit ea7608853b

View File

@ -145,11 +145,10 @@ pub fn is_letter(c: &char) -> bool { LETTERS.contains(&c) }
#[inline]
pub fn is_number(c: &char) -> bool { NUMBERS.contains(&c) }
/*
EXTREMELY Janky function that tries to put asterisks in the proper places to be parsed. This is so cursed. But it works, and I hopefully won't ever have to touch it again.
One limitation though, variables with multiple characters like `pi` cannot be multiplied (like `pipipipi` won't result in `pi*pi*pi*pi`). But that's such a niche use case (and that same thing could be done by using exponents) that it doesn't really matter.
In the future I may want to completely rewrite this or implement this natively in exmex.
*/
/// EXTREMELY Janky function that tries to put asterisks in the proper places to be parsed. This is so cursed. But it works, and I hopefully won't ever have to touch it again.
/// One limitation though, variables with multiple characters like `pi` cannot be multiplied (like `pipipipi` won't result in `pi*pi*pi*pi`). But that's such a niche use case (and that same thing could be done by using exponents) that it doesn't really matter.
/// In the future I may want to completely rewrite this or implement this natively in exmex.
// TODO: use `split_function` here instead of this janky code
pub fn process_func_str(function_in: &str) -> String {
let function = function_in
.replace("log10(", "log(") // log10 -> log